Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: jerlouvis Date: Nov 2, 2011 8:41pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: STRINGY CHEESY GOODNESS! utter dreck

All sixteen minutes of it were awful,it sounds like music accompanying a cult induction,and the Eyes of the World was so bad as to make a 94' Dead version sound brilliant.They suck on many levels.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rdenirojb87 Date: Nov 2, 2011 9:12pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: STRINGY CHEESY GOODNESS! utter dreck

"it sounds like music accompanying a cult induction"

"the Eyes of the World was so bad as to make a 94' Dead version sound brilliant"


criticizing music in this way is so childish. please elaborate. these are not rational, sensible arguments, and they make you come off as unintelligent.

also, although i appreciate much of your input here and agree with many of your comments, i must say i lost a lot of respect in your musical opinion when you made this comment:
"I think John Kahn is a terrible musician"


This post was modified by rdenirojb87 on 2011-11-03 04:12:09

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: jerlouvis Date: Nov 3, 2011 10:02am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: STRINGY CHEESY GOODNESS! utter dreck

I'll express my opinion as I see fit,regardless of your overly sensitive guidelines. As for your respect level concerning my opinions,I'm not going to lose any sleep.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rdenirojb87 Date: Nov 3, 2011 10:32am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: STRINGY CHEESY GOODNESS! utter dreck

"egardless of your overly sensitive guidelines"
not overly sensitive. just rational. all i'm saying is if you're going to criticize music, you can't make any bit an argument for your case when you speak in terms such as you did.